Thursday, 8 February 2018

Unforgetting

When I wrote Stillness, Unwisdom & the Solstice last year, and spoke of feeling ‘unwise’, I was trying to articulate something I didn’t yet understand. I said:

I feel as if I know nothing, that I am searching in the dark for something that I have lost, and I barely know what that something is. But there is something about this state that intrigues me, despite the difficulty and frustration of it.

Little did I know then that the idea of unwisdom would gradually come to make more and more sense. 

For several years I have been very aware of the idea of ‘Uncivilisation’, for example, in terms of the work of the Dark Mountain Project. I am also aware of Steve Thorp’s notion of ‘unpsychology’. Both civilisation and mainstream psychology, it can be argued, have been leading us in some very unhealthy and destructive directions, and therefore it makes sense to turn them around, upside down and inside out, to think critically about them, to find a way to undo them, to unseat their power, and replace it with something that leads in a more life-affirming direction.

I’ve also been intrigued by the (somewhat made-up) word unforgetting, which seems to me to state something more than the word remembering, despite meaning essentially the same thing. So words prefixed with un- have been a preoccupation for some time.

But with the recent passing of Ursula Le Guin, and the flood of her quotes that appeared on social media, I came across this one:

I love my unteachers - the feminist thinkers and writers and talkers and poets and artists and singers and critics and friends, from Wollstonecraft and Woolf through the furies and glories of the seventies and eighties - I celebrate here and now the women who for two centuries have worked for our freedom, the unteachers, the unmasters, the unconquerors, the unwarriors, women who have at risk and at high cost offered their experience as truth. "Let us NOT praise famous women!" Virginia Woolf scribbled in a margin when she was writing Three Guineas, and she's right, but still I have to praise these women and thank them for setting me free in my old age to learn my own language. (1)

That’s when all my thoughts on unwisdom and unlearning fell into place. 

Because I am so very interested in the roots of things, in the primal, elemental and original, an unlearning must take place. In following the path of radical feminism (or radical anythingradical, of course, meaning ‘root’), there is a necessary descent, a peeling away of what is known to reach the fundamentals, the roots of the problems we face, and perhaps the roots of solutions too, to the bedrock of experience, and—truth. There is a requirement to analyse the patriarchal/industrial system as it exists, and see it for what it is: an accretion of knowledge that is not really knowledge at all, but a distortion of the primal realities. Thus, feminist knowledge is passed on by unteachers, for it is only by questioning all that we have been taught that we come to a place of real knowledge. Perhaps still imperfect, but closer to the truth than anything else.

Importantly, these un- words are not simply the antithesis of the words they modify: unmasters, unconquerers, unwarriors. Instead, they are more complex, only sometimes merely reversing meanings, but more often redefining the meanings entirely.

I believe that the word ‘unwarrior’, for instance, does not necessarily mean that women should not be warriors, that we should not fight and resist when needed, but that we must do so in a completely different way to the masculinist norm. In the same way, we need to learn by unlearning, teach by unteaching, find wisdom in unwisdom—yet how we do this will not be by simply reversing the dominant narratives. We need to be critical and analytical, yet also intuitive and creative. The way out of distorted thinking and into more truthful knowledge will no doubt follow a twisting path, with many layers spiralling downwards into the past, and upwards into the possible future.

Many (feminists, indigenous people, and people of colour) have said that we must ‘decolonise our minds’. Jane Caputi says we must ‘unthink the thinkable; that is, we must unthink nuclear war, environmental devastation, the destruction of the forests, and so on … we must gather, talk back, and refuse and refute these thoughts’. (2) We must make what is currently thinkable, unthinkable.

In my recent post, The Sacredness of What Is, I said:

When you strip away the distortions and illusions of (industrial) civilisation, what you will find is that little, perhaps nothing, is human-made. Instead, it is earth-made, earth-given. Earth our Mother, our home, our teacher and resting place.

What I mean by this is that although we humans create cultures, lifeways, philosophies, and so forth, all of these things are ultimately derived from our relationship and interaction with the earth, with nature and the land we live on. Healthy human cultures are born from and dependent upon the natural world, and certainly not in opposition to nature. This is quite evident in nature-based, indigenous societies. 

However, my theory is that over time, as we have grown more and more disconnected from nature, we have lost touch with our original, earth-given knowledge (sometimes deliberately denying it), and built extensively and unnaturally upon the base of our primal lifeways and perceptions of reality, elaborating them to the extent that they become distorted and often illusory. Thus we have an industrial culture that thinks it can take from the earth without giving anything back (or giving back toxins and waste), without suffering the consequences. Even when there is an acknowledgement of the problems that arise, the dominant belief is that we can simply solve the problems with a never-ending array of new technologies. This is not so.

Julien Puzey has said:

What if knowledge isn’t what Western culture says it is—the amount of data I’ve accumulated in my great gray file—and instead is the capacity to be open to making connections between the is-ness that is going on? The way we change our way of knowing is to become open to process and to the making of connections. (3)

What I am trying to get at is the essential truth that there is a solid foundation of knowing, of how we are meant to be as human beings, and that this is not wholly human-made, but is primarily earth-made, as well as a joint earth–human undertaking. When we listen to the Earth, and live by her rules and limitations, wherever we happen to be in the world, we live well and sustainably. But once nature is removed from the picture, we are left with purely anthropocentric constructs that are, of course, real, in the physical, psychological and spiritual impacts that they have, but unreal in the sense that they do not actually reflect what is.

Thus, my interest in all the un- words is is about finding that base level of knowing and being that is the Real. Uncovering, unlearning, unknowing, unthinking, unmaking, undoing, unravelling, unseparating, uncontrolling, unshackling … unearthing, in order to find Earth once more.

This, I think, will be an endless, and probably unachievable, project, but I think it is essential to make the attempt. It is only in reconnecting with the Real that we have any hope of changing our culture. And that is where the re- words become important: renewing, reconnecting, relearning, rethinking, remaking, redoing, reconstructing, regrowing, regenerating, reimagining, rewilding, rejoining … remembering what we were as humans, not so very long ago.

For those of us who are not as connected with the earth as we should be—which is just about everyone in the modern world—the first place to start unlearning and unthinking is in the primary reality of our bodies (as microcosms of the earth-body, and indeed the universe). It is in finding ways to be ourselves that are not controlled by cultural forces, expectations and fashions, and ‘becoming animal’ (to use the title of one of David Abram’s extraordinary books)—rediscovering, through the wisdom of our animal senses, through the ongoing processes of life, what is truly real.

This goal will also involve exploring how we think and use language—subjects that I hope to explore in the near future.

This seems, even to me, like a grandiose project; yet I cannot simply ignore it. I’ve been called by the darkness, by the old roots that sustain all, despite our best efforts to cut them off and forget them forever. Yet the roots have always been inside us, in our DNA, in all our living cells, perhaps also in our dreams. All we have to do is unforget. 

At the Root, water-mixable oil paints on paper, 2015

References:
1. Ursula K. Le Guin, from her address at the 1986 Bryn Mawr College Commencement, https://serendip.brynmawr.edu/sci_cult/leguin/
2. Jane Caputi, Gossips, Gorgons & Crones: The Fates of the Earth, Bear & Company: Santa Fe, 1993, pp. 78–79
3. Interview with Dolores LaChapelle and Julien Puzey in Derrick Jensen, Listening to the Land: Conversations about Nature, Culture, and Eros, Chelsea Green Publishing: White River Junction, Vermont, 2002, 2004, p. 238

6 comments:

  1. Therese, so much food for thought here. It points out to me that, while I feel that western civilization will not change toward a more earth-based society without a major global crisis and upheaval, positive change is probably not what the result would be...it would just lead to even more of the same "unsolutions." Maybe because this would all be framed around the same cultural norms of conflict that got us here in the first place. Whereas change growing from a grassroots (individual) level is what may lead us to a truly different outcome. I still think the majority of humans would need a precipitating event to shake them out of their complacency with the status quo. And if global warming and the destruction of our planet isn't a huge enough disaster to unite us, what is? Anyway, thanks for sharing your very interesting thoughts on this and I'm interested in eventually hearing how you envision us bringing our redefined reality outward to create radical cultural change. Carmine

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Carmine. I do agree—something big will need to occur to force us to change; yet even then, there will probably be an elite that continues to try to rebuild things in the same way, if only for themselves (endless "unsolutions"). I think there will likely be waves of collapse, if/when it happens, that go on for some time. It's a scary vision. I've thought myself that the problems of Western civilisation will never be solved by Western civilisation; thus we need to dig underneath it to figure out how to get out of this mess. That should involve listening to indigenous and other suppressed cultures, but also finding the roots of our own culture, working out where we went wrong, and then rebuilding from that point. It's all theory at this point, just ideas. And while I agree with you that we need change to come from a grassroots level, I still think it must be community-based, not just individual. We need individual change which actually leads to the creation of self-governed communities (perhaps bioregional areas).

      Delete
    2. Yes, decentralizing from the global and reconnecting with the local. Putting people and their relationships with their communities and place back in the center. Western thought went wrong quite long ago, I think, and now its sickness has spread to many places across the world. Since the arrival of the Europeans with their notions of manifest destiny, genocide and slavery, North American societies have been founded on greed, white supremacy and injustice. Some of us feel the burden of that that, and are beginning perhaps to see the roles we may play in enabling these founding injustices to continue, and maybe begin the painful process of healing them.

      Delete
    3. Agreed. There is much work to be done, and thankfully, many people who are attempting to do that work, despite the difficulties in their paths.

      Delete
  2. yes, I think there is a growing recognition of the fact that our way home, back to a sustainable way of life, cannot come from the same paradigm and thought processes that have produced the madness and wasteland in which we now find ourselves...

    radical solutions must, by definition, start at the root of a problem. and since it is human civilization (and its discontents) that lie at the root of our ecocide and the unjust, toxic, mad trajectory we've been on for some thousands of years, a big shiny mirror needs to be held up to that.

    perhaps what we need is to confront within ourselves, and in our cultures, the ways in which we humans have dismembered the world around us, dismembered our own beings in the process; our "unforgetting" could lead us to a true remembering, in the literal sense of the word: a putting back together of what was maimed, what was reduced to component parts. a return to enmeshed and reverent wholeness...

    bring it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, the problems of Western civilisation will not be solved by Western civilisation, that's for sure. The Western way of thinking is, I believe, fundamentally flawed.

      I agree. We need to confront the monsters we have created—or perhaps the monsters we have suppressed, the ones we think we can control or ignore, keep buried deep so we don't have to think about them.

      I think we need to see civilisation for what it is, but also recognise that not all humans are 'civilised'. Most cultures have in fact known how to live sustainably; some of those cultures still survive, if in a damaged form. We should be listening to them, learning from them, and reaching back to our own indigenous roots—for we were all indigenous once. Thus, the answers are already there, we just need to get down off our high horse and have the humility to listen, relearn, remember.

      Delete

Thank you for taking the time to comment. I love hearing from you.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...